Legal Opinion
Philadelphia Housing Authority v. CedarCrestone, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 25, 2008No. Civil Action 08-1192PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiff Philadelphia Housing Authority (“PHA”) entered into a contract with Defendant CedarCrestone, Inc., pursuant to which CedarCrestone would upgrade PHA’s PeopleSoft software system from version 8.8 to 8.9, and implement various other system improvements, within nine months. The contract allegedly required deliverables and status reports from Ce-darCrestone while the upgrade was ongoing. By subsequent agreement, the parties allegedly modified the contract so that the PeopleSoft software would be upgraded to version 9.0.
PHA…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Schott v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Pittsburgh Construction Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Hershey Foods Corporation v. Ralph Chapek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- TruServ Corp. v. Morgan's Tool & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
- Star v. RosenthalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Northgate Village Development, LC v. Orem CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- In re ThorpeUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- TALEN ENERGY MARKETING, LLC v. ALUMINUM SHAPES, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.