Legal Opinion

State v. Newman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 13, 2002No. 2000-657PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.

The defendant, Steven Newman, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neill, J.) of aggravated felonious sexual assault against a victim younger than thirteen. See RSA 682-A:2, I (1996). He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred when it: (1) ruled that he could not cross-examine the victim about her knowledge of a friend’s recent sexual assault allegations; and (2) allowed a laboratory technician to render an expert opinion about the potential sources of red blood cells found in a vaginal smear. We affirm.

The jury could have found the following facts. On the evening of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
  3. State v. CresseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
  4. State v. MountjoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
  5. State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  2. State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  3. Baker Valley Lumber, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. FernandezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. State v. BrumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API