State v. Newman
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C. J.
The defendant, Steven Newman, was convicted after a jury trial in Superior Court (O’Neill, J.) of aggravated felonious sexual assault against a victim younger than thirteen. See RSA 682-A:2, I (1996). He appeals, arguing that the trial court erred when it: (1) ruled that he could not cross-examine the victim about her knowledge of a friend’s recent sexual assault allegations; and (2) allowed a laboratory technician to render an expert opinion about the potential sources of red blood cells found in a vaginal smear. We affirm.
The jury could have found the following facts. On the evening of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. BallSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. CresseySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- State v. MountjoySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- State v. SmartSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. LockeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
- Baker Valley Lumber, Inc. v. Ingersoll-Rand Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
- State v. FernandezSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
- State v. BrumSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.