Legal Opinion

Wesch v. Hunt

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided May 18, 1992No. Civ. A. 91-0787PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before COX, Circuit Judge, HAND, Senior District Judge, and ALBRITTON, District Judge. BY THE COURT.

INTRODUCTION

On September 23, 1991, Plaintiff Paul Charles Wesch brought this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against the Governor of Alabama, as well as other state officials, contending, inter alia, that the present State law defining congressional districts in the State of Alabama violates Art. I, § 2 of the Constitution. Based on 1990 census data, Wesch specifically alleges that if the 1992 congressional elections were to be held under the present…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Wesberry v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Plessy v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Kirkpatrick v. PreislerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Chapman v. MeierSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Connor v. FinchSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Wesch v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  2. Larios v. CoxDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2004
  3. LeRoux v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Allen v. MilliganSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Wesch v. FolsomCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API