Legal Opinion
King v. Fayette County
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 30, 1981No. Civ. A. Nos. 81-2074 to 81-2076PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DIAMOND, District Judge.
After grant of leave of Court to proceed in forma pauperis,, the plaintiff, Robert W. King, filed pro se complaints in these three captioned cases. After review of the complaints, the court finds that they are legally defective under Rule 8(a) of the Fed.R. Civ.P. and legally and factually frivolous under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, and therefore is constrained to dismiss the actions sua sponte.1
As near as can be determined by the Court, the complaints allege that officers *458and/or agents of Fayette County, Pennsylvania, the Fayette County Community Mental Health…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Procunier v. NavaretteSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- DALTON v. SAINT BARNABAS MEDICAL CENTERDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2025
- Keno v. DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987