Legal Opinion

Keno v. Davis

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 87-5742Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KATZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff has filed a civil rights complaint as well as a petition to proceed in forma pauperis. As it appears that plaintiff is unable to pay the costs of commencing this suit, leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted.

Plaintiff’s complaint names as defendants over 70 individuals including various Internal Revenue Service Agents, politicians, prosecutors, private attorneys, Florida and New Jersey state judges and federal court judges, as well as “selected 3rd-party-fronts and holders, accomplices and co-conspirators.” She alleges that all of these individuals…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States ex rel. Walker v. Fayette CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  3. Clark v. ZimmermanDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Daves v. ScrantonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. King v. Fayette CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API