In Re Pajerowski
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Per curiam
This matter arises from a recommendation for discipline filed by the Committee on Attorney Advertising (“CAA”) against respondent, Patrick M. Pajerowski. Respondent and the CAA executed a Stipulation of Facts and Discipline in which respondent admitted that he had violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: RPC 1.2(a) (failing to abide by client’s decision); RPC 1.3 (failing to act with diligence); RPC 1.4(a) (failing to communicate); RPC 1.7(a), RPC 1.7(b), and RPC 1.7(c) (representing clients with conflicts of interest); RPC 1.8(e) (providing financial assistance to client); RPC…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- In Re VerdiramoSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
- Chreste v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Matter of EdsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re BreslinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- Pietsch v. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- In Re BreslinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- In Re Opinion No. 735 of the Supreme Court Advisory Committee on Professional EthicsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2025
- In Re RivaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.