Legal Opinion
Le Pak v. Hedberg
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 18, 1927No. 25,872PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, O. J.
Plaintiffs appealed from an order denying their motion for a new trial.
The action is in replevin to recover the possession of lumber which was taken from defendants. They did not re-bond and the jury returned a verdict for defendants and determined the value at $535.50.
On March 12, 1924, the owner gave to Blanch Locke Otto the right to cut timber on certain lands. This permit was assigned to defendants.
On March 12, 1924, the owner gave to one Novitzke a permit to cut timber on adjacent lands. This permit expired June 1, 1925. It was assigned to plaintiffs who, on August 3, 1925,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirk v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Dimond v. ManheimSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Westbrook v. GuderianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Schaefer v. NylinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- Michael v. BallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Poksyla v. SundholmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- In Re Estate of PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Makiesky v. National Guardian Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- Clover v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Groves v. ByrnesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930