Legal Opinion

Capuano v. Zolla

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1958PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank E. Johnson, Off. Ref.

Testimony has been taken, and a brief submitted, under the order to hear and determine a motion by a defendant corporation to vacate a service of the *97summons and complaint herein. Proof came first on the service of those papers, hut it later developed that the real question was not whether service was duly made but whether the moving party had waived the right to make such motion.

The matters now disposed of should be considered in proper order; the first should he whether there is any question of fact to be decided here, in view of the claim of the plaintiff that…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Henderson v. HendersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Muslusky v. . Lehigh Valley Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  3. Braman v. BramanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Citizens Trust Co. v. R. Prescott & Son, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. Paine Lumber Co. v. GalbraithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Becker v. LesnickNew York Supreme Court · 1978
  2. 16 Lincoln Square Associates v. Amrep Corp.Civil Court of the City of New York · 1985
  3. Nardi v. HirshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API