Legal Opinion

Brown v. Brown

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1893No. 16,095PublishedCited by 19 opinions

From the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

The only question properly presented hy .the record, in this cause, is the sufficiency of the complaint of the appellants. It is in two paragraphs, seeking partition of a tract of land in Crawfordsville. Each paragraph alleges that the appellee was the second wife of James Brown, who died intestate, on the 21st day of February, 1890, leaving said appellee without children, but leaving appellants as his children by a former marriage; that on the 26th day of March, 1875, one Ramey conveyed said tract to said James and his wife, the appellee, the deed of conveyance containing the following…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hadlock v. GrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Hicks v. CochranNew York Court of Chancery · 1843
  3. Cloos v. CloosNew York Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Wintermute v. ReeseIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1912
  2. Mirsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  3. Craig v. BennettIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Simons v. BollingerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Erwin v. Central Union Telephone Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API