Legal Opinion

Simons v. Bollinger

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1900No. 18,779PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Brom the LaGrange Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.

Kerr and wife held land conveyed to them by deed in the words following: “Convey and warrant to David S. Kerr and Clara Kerr, his wife, jointly the” etc.

The only question presented for decision is. whether the words employed created in David and Clara Kerr an estate in joint tenancy, or an estate by entireties. It is agreed that if they create an estate in joint tenancy, the judgment should be reversed; and if an estate by entirety, it should be affirmed. It is also conceded by appellant that “the omission from the deed of the word ‘jointly’ would clearly make Kerr and wife tenants by the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Phelps v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Davis v. ClarkIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Thornburg v. WigginsIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Case v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Wilkins v. YoungIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Vasilion v. VasilionSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  2. Davis v. . BassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  3. Overheiser v. . LackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. Mirsky v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  5. Kolker v. GornCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API