Legal Opinion

Stripland v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided March 11, 1902PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Indictment for receiving stolen goods. Before Judge Estes. Hall superior court. January 4, 1902.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

1. The accused being indicted for receiving stolen goods, and the evidence being insufficient to show beyond a reasonable doubt that at the time of the reception of the goods he knew they had been stolen, his conviction was not warranted, and a new trial should have been granted.

2. While in order to convict one of the offense of receiving stolen goods the guilt of the principal must be shown (Edwards v. State, 80 Ga. 127), the record of the conviction and sentence of the principal is prima facie evidence of his guilt, and places the onus upon the accused of showing that he was not properly…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  2. Edwards v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  3. Nichols v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  5. Arkwright v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API