Arkwright v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.
1. “Knowledge that goods are stolen is an essential element of the crime of receiving stolen goods (Sanford v. State, 4 Ga. App. 449, 61 S. E. 741; O’Connell v. State, 55 Ga. 191), and'this knowledge on the part of the accused must be proved, to warrant a conviction under the Penal Code, § 168 (Stripland v. State, 114 Ga. 843, 40 S. E. 993); but it may be inferred from circumstances (Birdsong v. State, 120 Ga. 850, 48 S. E. 329; Rivers v. State, 118 Ga. 42-45, 44 S. E. 859), where the circumstances shown would excite suspicion in the minds of ordinarily prudent men (Cobb v. State, 76 Ga. 664;…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Birdsong v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Cobb v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1886
- Daniel v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Rivers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- O'Connell v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Austin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1954
- Bird v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
- Gaskin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
- Tucker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.