Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance v. British-American Corp.

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided June 8, 1990No. 89-303-CIV-5PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BRITT, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the court upon plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment. Following the hearing, the court has reviewed the materials before it and determines the motion should be treated as a motion to strike insufficient defenses and allowed.

I

Plaintiffs instituted this action seeking $2,960,000.00 plus interest for the alleged fraudulent conveyance of the Fiji subsidiary of defendant British American Insurance Company Limited (BAICL). They seek partial satisfaction of a judgment against Fort Lincoln Life Insurance Company (FLLIC) rendered in 1984 by the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Langley v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. 729.773 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situate in HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1982
  4. Gallant v. Kanterman (In Re Kanterman)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1989
  5. Gallant v. Kanterman (In Re Kanterman)District Court, S.D. New York · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Billie Williams v. Jader Fuel Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Clark v. MilamDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1993
  3. National Credit Union Administration v. First Union Capital Markets Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  4. United States v. Windward Properties, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1993
  5. Federal Deposit Insurance v. British-American Corp.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API