Legal Opinion

The People v. Hamel

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1946No. 28952. Reversed and remandedPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

An indictment returned in the circuit court of Boone county charged Raymond Hamel, plaintiff in error herein, and Henry J. Gellach, with the crime of burglary. Hamel pleaded guilty and brings the common-law record here by writ of error for review. The contention that the penalty imposed on the plea of guilty was in violation of an agreement plaintiff in error had with the officers that the penalty was to be less than the one given, cannot be considered. The reason is that any agreement, if one was entered into, is not a part of the common-law record.

The other assignments of error refer to the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. The People v. WoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People ex rel. Fensky v. LeineckeIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  3. People ex rel. Lucey v. TurneyIllinois Supreme Court · 1916
  4. People v. BoerIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  5. People Ex Rel. Ewald v. MontgomeryIllinois Supreme Court · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. The People v. WatsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1946
  2. People v. HillsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  3. The People v. WakelandIllinois Supreme Court · 1958
  4. People v. HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. People v. RossIllinois Supreme Court · 1951

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API