Stansbury v. Heiduck

MACY, Justice.

Appellant Doris Stansbury (Doris) appeals from the distinct court’s judgment which quieted the title to certain Laramie County property in favor of Appellee Howard Hei-duek (Howard).

We affirm.

ISSUES

Doris presents the following issues for our review:

A. Did Heiduck establish that his use of the subject property was adverse to that of the real owner?

B. If Doris Stansbury did not know that she had an interest in the subject property, could Heiduck’s use of the property be hostile to her interest?

FACTS

On August 8, 1977, Donald Stansbury (Donald) executed a warranty deed, conveying…