Rutar Farms & Livestock, Inc. v. Fuss
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Appellants sued in the district court to quiet title to about 31 acres of land. Their theory of recovery was ownership by adverse possession. Appellees Fuss and the State of Wyoming are record titleholders of the disputed land. The trial judge entered judgment in favor of the record titleholders and quieted title in them. Appellants designate the issues as follows:
1. Did the plaintiffs and their predecessors in interest have actual, open, notorious, exclusive and hostile possession of the disputed lands under a claim of right for a period of ten consecutive years?
2. Were the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Rock Springs v. SturmWyoming Supreme Court · 1929
- Da Shores v. Dl LindseyWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
- Gray v. FitzhughWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
- Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Central Engineering & Equipment CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
- Meyer v. EllisWyoming Supreme Court · 1966
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Doenz v. GarberWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- Mueller v. HoblynWyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Hillard v. MarshallWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Braunstein v. Robinson Family Ltd. Partnership LLPWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
- Davis v. ChadwickWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.