Legal Opinion

Federal Trade Commission v. Whitney & Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 1, 1951No. 12700PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.

Under § 11 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 21, the Federal Trade Commission, on February 12, 1945, issued a complaint charging that Whitney & Company, James R. O’Brien and others had violated and were violating the provisions of § 2(c) of the Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(c). The complaint was served on the persons complained of (Whitney & Company, O’Brien and others) on February 14, 1945. It contained a notice of hearing. Said persons appeared, and a hearing was had. Thereupon, being of the opinion that said persons had violated and were violating the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education Soc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  5. Federal, Trade Commission v. Baltimore Paint & Color Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. In Re Whitney & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Washington Fish & Oyster Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API