Federal Trade Commission v. Whitney & Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MATHEWS, Circuit Judge.
Under § 11 of the Clayton Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 21, the Federal Trade Commission, on February 12, 1945, issued a complaint charging that Whitney & Company, James R. O’Brien and others had violated and were violating the provisions of § 2(c) of the Act, as amended, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(c). The complaint was served on the persons complained of (Whitney & Company, O’Brien and others) on February 14, 1945. It contained a notice of hearing. Said persons appeared, and a hearing was had. Thereupon, being of the opinion that said persons had violated and were violating the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Federal Trade Commission v. BalmeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Education Soc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Federal Trade Commission v. HerzogCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Federal, Trade Commission v. Baltimore Paint & Color Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1930
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- In Re Whitney & Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Federal Trade Commission v. Washington Fish & Oyster Company, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952