Legal Opinion
Federal Trade Commission v. Washington Fish & Oyster Company, Inc., a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 12, 1959No. 16541PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.
The Federal Trade Commission has applied to this court for enforcement of a cease and desist order entered under section 2(c) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C.A. § 13(c). The cease and desist order, issued on March 25, 1946, directed Washington Fish & Oyster Company, Inc., to cease and desist from
“ •* * * paying or granting, directly or indirectly, to any buyer anything of value as a commission or brokerage, or any compensation, allowance, or discount in lieu thereof, upon purchases made for such buyer’s own account.”
On June 7, 1957,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Ruberoid Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Standard Oil Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Federal Trade Commission v. Simplicity Pattern Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Rangen, Inc., a Corporation, Buhl Feed & Ice Company, a Corporation, and Elwood D. Grimes v. Sterling Nelson & Sons, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Purolator Products, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
- Watkins & Son Pet Supplies v. Iams Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999
- Ideal Plumbing Company v. Benco, Inc., and Zapata Warrior ConstructorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Motor Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.