Legal Opinion

Henry v. Klein

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided August 16, 1988No. 5843PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStoughton, J.

The named defendant, Barry M. Klein, appeals from a judgment rendered for the plaintiff after trial to the court. Klein claims that the trial court erred (1) in finding that the plaintiff had satisfied his burden of persuasion, (2) in admitting into evidence a portion of a codefendant’s deposition as an admission against Klein, (3) in permitting the plaintiff to introduce evidence which was outside the scope of the pleadings, (4) in permitting the plaintiff to amend his complaint after trial had commenced, and (5) in finding that there was insufficient evidence to establish the defenses of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Dacey v. Connecticut Bar Assn.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  3. Busker v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  4. Shenefield v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Cook v. LawlorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cook v. BieluchConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  2. Moore v. SergiConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  3. Budlong v. NadeauConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  4. Colonial Bank & Trust Co. v. MatoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Banks v. VitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API