Legal Opinion
Budlong v. Nadeau
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 19, 1993No. 10612PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLavery, J.
The pro se defendant appeals from the trial court’s judgment for the plaintiff following a jury trial on both the plaintiff’s action for libel and the defendant’s counterclaim for legal malpractice. The defendant claims that the trial court (1) improperly allowed the jury to consider evidence that was not referred to in the complaint, (2) improperly instructed *62the jury regarding a number of issues, and (3) generally deprived him of a fair trial. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts. In February, 1988, the defendant contacted the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Conservation Commission v. PriceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Small v. South Norwalk Savings BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whisper Wind Development Corp. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Schnabel v. TylerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- In re Donna M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- State v. BarnesConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Corcoran v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.