Townsend v. Doe ex dem. Chapin
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
AFTER the testimony in this case was closed, the defendants moved that every instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof to the jury, should be in writing, and objected *329to any instruction, or modification, or explanation thereof being given, unless the same should be written. Held, that the Court, by afterwards giving, at the plaintiff’s request, instructions to the jury with verbal explanations and illustrations, committed an error. Stat. 1839, ,p. 37.
2Cited by10 opinions
- State v. PotterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Bradway v. WaddellIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- City of Atchison v. JansenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
- Lung v. DealIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.