Legal Opinion

Swarringim v. Olson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 17, 2010No. 180807477, 180807478 A138928 (Control), A138929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Respondents appeal stalking protective orders (SPOs) entered against them pursuant to ORS 30.866, prohibiting them from having contact with petitioner or her family. Respondents argue that the evidence is insufficient to warrant the issuance of the orders. On de novo review, Osborne v. Fadden, 225 Or App 431, 433, 201 P3d 278, rev den, 346 Or 213 (2009); Hanzo v. deParrie, 152 Or App 525, 536-37, 953 P2d 1130 (1998), rev den, 328 Or 418 (1999), we agree with respondents and reverse.

To obtain an SPO against a person under ORS 30.866(1), a petitioner must demonstrate by a preponderance of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. RangelOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. MoyleOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Weatherly v. WilkieCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Osborne v. FaddenOregon Supreme Court · 2009

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Christensen v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  2. Reitz v. ErazoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Brown v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Blastic v. HolmCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  5. Layne v. MacDonaldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API