Legal Opinion

Darst v. BLAIRSTOWN TP. ZONING

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 27, 2009No. DOCKET NO. A-5501-06T2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

982 A.2d 27 (2009)

410 N.J. Super. 314

Carl and Della DARST, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

BLAIRSTOWN TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, Defendant-Respondent.

DOCKET NO. A-5501-06T2.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued September 23, 2009.

Decided October 27, 2009.

Richard I. Clark, Sparta, argued the cause for appellants (Laddey, Clark & Ryan, LLP, attorneys; Mr. Clark and Ursula H. Leo, on the brief).

Roger W. Thomas, Newton, argued the cause for respondent (Dolan and Dolan, P.A., attorneys; Mr. Thomas and Anand Dash, on the brief).

Before Judges STERN, COLLESTER and SABATINO.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Kramer v. BD. OF ADJUST., SEA GIRT.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  3. Ward v. ScottSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Burbridge v. Governing BodySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. Kohl v. Mayor and Council of Borough of Fair LawnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DEPETRIS FAMILY ASSOCIATES 2, LLC VS. MEDFORD TOWNSHIP ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT (L-2149-19, BURLINGTON COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
  2. Shipyard Associates, L.P. v. City of Hoboken (082446) (Hudson County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API