Legal Opinion

Zurich American Insurance v. Public Storage

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided September 17, 2010No. Case 1:09cv1394PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

T.S. ELLIS, III, District Judge.

The merits question presented in this diversity declaratory judgment action was whether plaintiff-insurer, Zurich American Insurance Company (“Zurich”), has a duty to defend any of the claims asserted against the defendant-insured. Public Storage, in an ongoing Virginia state court action. This question was resolved by Memorandum Opinion and accompanying Order dated September 16, 2010, which concluded that Zurich has a duty to defend one of the eight claims in the underlying lawsuit. See Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Public Storage, 1:09cv1394, 743 F.Supp.2d 525,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. Leingang v. PIERCE CO. MED. BUREAU, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Leingang v. Pierce County Medical Bureau, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Surety Corp. v. Immunex Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Nat'l Sur. Corp. v. Immunex Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  3. National Surety Corp. v. Immunex Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2013
  4. THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY v. BLUE RIDGE PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API