Legal Opinion

Nat'l Sur. Corp. v. Immunex Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 2013No. 86535-3Published

1Opinion of the Court

FILE IN CLERKS OFFICE llJII8E COURT, STAlE OF WA8HifGTON DATE MAR 0 7£(]13 ~/11_ OL cfaJL-r .C '· () CHIEF JUSfiCi> IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON NATIONAL SURETY CORPORATION, NO. 86535-3 Petitioner, v. ENBANC IMMUNEX CORPORATION, Respondent. Filed - - MAR- - - - - 0 7 2013 STEPHENS, J.-This court has long recognized that a liability insurer uncertain of its obligation to defend its insured may undertake a "reservation of rights" defense while seeking a declaration regarding coverage. The question in this case is whether the insurer may unilaterally condition its reservation…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Olympic Steamship Co., Inc. v. Centennial Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Tank v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Hecla Mining Co. v. New Hampshire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. American & Foreign Insurance v. Jerry's Sport Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API