State v. Osorio
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent 1
DISSENT
2Dissent · HudsonHudson, Justice
“A defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial....” Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 527, 92 S.Ct 2182, 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). Because the majority undermines this central tenet in its Sixth Amendment analysis, I respectfully dissent.
Both the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and our Minnesota Constitution provide that “[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial.” U.S. Const. amend. VI; Minn. Const. art. I, § 6; see State v. DeRosier, 695 N.W.2d 97, 108 (Minn. 2005). The Supreme Court has held that the delay between…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- State v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
- State v. OlkonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.