Schmitz v. Silver
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarejett, Presiding Judge
There is here brought before us for review the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the *1165decision of the Examiner of Interferences in an interference proceeding involving a single count which reads:
1. In an introducer, the combination of an elongated body having means at its forward end for bolding an edge of the article to be introduced, a detent guided to slide in the body and projecting from the same for engaging the article, and means for moving the detent toward the forward end of the body.
The specification of appellant’s application states:
* * *…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Thompson v. DunnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1948
- Hradel v. GriffithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
- Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. Staadt v. George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells, George L. Griffith, George A. Lyte and Franklin B. Wells v. Joseph R. Hradel and Harold E. StaadtCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967