Tomlinson v. El Paso Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
MILLER, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before me on the Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment on ADEA Claim (Docket No. 362), filed by Defendants El Paso Corporation and El Paso Pension Plan (collectively “El Paso”). Plaintiffs oppose the motion. Upon review of the parties’ filings and supplemental authority, I conclude oral argument is not required. For the reasons that follow, the motion for summary judgment will be granted and judgment shall enter as a matter of law on Plaintiffs sole pending claim, brought under the Age Discrimination in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- LOCKHEED CORP. Et Al. v. SPINKSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Hurlic v. Southern California Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.