Legal Opinion
Hurlic v. Southern California Gas Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 20, 2008No. 06-55599PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
N. RANDY SMITH, Circuit Judge:
David Hurlic, Susanna Selesky, and others similarly situated (“Plaintiffs”) 1 appeal the district court’s dismissal of the entirety of their lawsuit against Southern California Gas Company (“SCGC”) and the SCGC Pension Plan (“the Plan”). Plaintiffs allege that SCGC’s 1998 amendment of the Plan violated both the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.
This appeal requires our court to consider,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. JacobsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Rosenblatt v. United Way of Greater HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- Jamal Kifafi v. Hilton Hotel Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- John Loffredo v. Daimler AGCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Tomlinson v. El Paso Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- Frances Alday v. Raytheon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.