Legal Opinion

Moore v. . Tidwell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 10, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendants in limine renew their motion, originally made in the Superior Court, for- a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. It is alleged that additional information, which defendants consider vital and important to their cause, has come to their attention since the adjournment of the term of court at which the case was tried, and after the appeal was docketed here. Allen v. Gooding, 174 N. C., 271. The showing made by defendants in this respect seems to meet the requirements laid down in Johnson v. R. R., 163 N. C., p. 453, for the granting of new trials on the ground of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Carson v. . DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Allen v. . GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  3. Flowers v. . AlfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Breece v. JettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Harris v. ChapmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API