Flowers v. . Alford
Supreme Court of North Carolina
MotioN in the Supreme Court for a certiorari to the Judge below, requiring him to find the facts upon which the judgment was rendered as hereinafter stated.
1Opinion of the Court
MacRak, J.:
It appears from the affidavits filed that an action for the recovery of land, between the parties hereto, was tried at February Term, 1891, in the Superior Court of Richmond County, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant, on September 19, 1891, gave notice of a motion “for a new trial, and for the setting aside and reforming the judgment heretofore rendered in this cause,” to be made before the Judge presiding at Richmond Superior Court, on October 1, 1891. The record sent up does not show a continuance, but, at February Term, 1892, of Richmond…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Carson v. . DellingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- Beck v. . BellamySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Munden v. . CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Clemmons v. . FieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
3Cited by5 opinions
- Faison v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- Fleming v. Washington & Vandemere RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
- Moore v. . TidwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Sanford v. Junior Order of United American MechanicsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
- Brown v. Rhinehart Bros.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1893