Huskins v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Tennessee
On Motion to Remand. Action by W. G. Huskins against the Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Company for personal injuries.
1Opinion of the CourtKey, J.
The plaintiff began an action in the state court for personal injuries against the defendant. The cause was removed to this court, *505and, while the judge was charging the jury upon its trial, plaintiff’s counsel were permitted to take a nonsuit. Soon thereafter plaintiff instituted another suit against the defendant in the state court for the same cause of action. In this last suit he laid his damages at $2,000. The cause was returnable to the April term, 1888, at which time, under the laws of the state, the pleadings should bo made up and issue joined. The first trial term of the cause was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kurtz v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
3Cited by10 opinions
- Egan v. Preferred Accident Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Ft. Smith W. R. Co. v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Mattoon v. ReynoldsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Connecticut · 1894
- Key v. West Kentucky Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1916
- Bon v. Midwest Refining Co.District Court, D. Wyoming · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.