Legal Opinion

Bon v. Midwest Refining Co.

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided January 23, 1929No. 1865PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, District Judge,

The above-entitled cause is before the court upon motion to remand. The grounds of the motion -are, in substance, that the petition for removal was not filed in time, and that there was no authority on the part of the court commissioner of the state court to issue the order of removal. Upon the argument the latter ground was virtually abandoned, as well it might have been, for the reason that a •removal is accomplished by filing a proper proceeding in the state court with jurisdictional facts alleged, even should the state court judge fail to sign the order.

Upon the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Union Pacific Railway Co. v. WylerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Boatmen's Bank v. FritzlenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
  5. Fritzlen v. Boatmen's BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1943
  2. Murphy v. JohnsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1931
  3. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Cities Service Gas Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API