Legal Opinion

United States v. Pablo

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided April 8, 1999No. ARMY 9700481PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

CAIRNS, Senior Judge:

At a fully contested general court-martial, a panel of officer and enlisted members acquitted the appellant of sodomy with a child under the age of twelve but convicted him of the lesser included offense of indecent acts with a child under sixteen years of age, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to Private El.

In reviewing this case under Article 66, UCMJ, we have examined the record of trial and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  4. Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  2. United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API