United States v. Pablo
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
CAIRNS, Senior Judge:
At a fully contested general court-martial, a panel of officer and enlisted members acquitted the appellant of sodomy with a child under the age of twelve but convicted him of the lesser included offense of indecent acts with a child under sixteen years of age, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the sentence of a bad-conduct discharge and reduction to Private El.
In reviewing this case under Article 66, UCMJ, we have examined the record of trial and…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
- Fahy v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
- United States v. PabloCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000