United States v. Pablo
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court 1
U.S. v. Pablo
IN THE CASE OF
UNITED STATES, Appellee
v.
Rogelio PABLO, Staff Sergeant
U.S. Army, Appellant
No. 99-0681
Crim. App. No. 9700481
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Argued February 4, 2000
Decided August 25, 2000
2Opinion of the Court · GierkeGierke, J., joined by Effron, J., and Everett, S.J.,
CRAWFORD, C.J., and SULLIVAN, J., each filed a dissenting opinion.
Counsel
For Appellant: Captain Blair T. OConnor (argued); Colonel Adele H. Odegard, Major Scott R. Morris, and Major Kirsten V.C. Brunson (on brief).
For Appellee: Captain Katherine M. Kane (argued); Colonel Russell S. Estey and Lieutenant Colonel Eugene R. Milhizer (on brief); Captain Mary E. Braisted.
3Cases cited35 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.