Legal Opinion

United States v. Pablo

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided August 25, 2000No. 99-0681/ARPublished

1Opinion of the Court 1

U.S. v. Pablo

IN THE CASE OF

UNITED STATES, Appellee

v.

Rogelio PABLO, Staff Sergeant

U.S. Army, Appellant

No. 99-0681

Crim. App. No. 9700481

United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Argued February 4, 2000

Decided August 25, 2000

2Opinion of the Court · GierkeGierke, J., joined by Effron, J., and Everett, S.J.,

CRAWFORD, C.J., and SULLIVAN, J., each filed a dissenting opinion.

Counsel

For Appellant: Captain Blair T. O’Connor (argued); Colonel Adele H. Odegard, Major Scott R. Morris, and Major Kirsten V.C. Brunson (on brief).

For Appellee: Captain Katherine M. Kane (argued); Colonel Russell S. Estey and Lieutenant Colonel Eugene R. Milhizer (on brief); Captain Mary E. Braisted.

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. O'NEAL v. McAninchSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Lakeside v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API