Legal Opinion

State v. Horowich

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 15, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On exceptions. The respondent was indicted for unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, tried and found guilty, and seasonably took exceptions to the admission of certain testimony introduced at the trial. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.

This is an indictment charging the respondent with unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and the case is before the court on exceptions.

The exceptions state that, “the respondent was the proprietor of a drug store at the corner of Oxford and Myrtle Streets in the city of Portland. On the fifteenth day of August, 1920, the Sheriff of the County of Cumberland, accompanied by some of his deputies, visited the premises. They found on the premises, in the possession of the respondent, a certain quantity of witch hazel, Florida water, Beef, Iron and Wine,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. SinclairMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. IhmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  2. Tutsbree v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Varner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API