Legal Opinion

People v. Ihm

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 20, 1966No. Crim. 2618PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of violation of section 11500, Health and Safety Code. He was charged in one count of an indictment, which also charged a codefendant, Steven Harry Muns, with sales of narcotics and possessing heroin. In his separate trial, a jury found defendant Ihm guilty as charged. The court denied his motion for a new trial and sentenced him to prison for the term prescribed by law. The reporter’s transcript states that the court sentenced defendant “for the offense of which he stands convicted.” However, the judgment as entered in the minutes and the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. WinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. People v. CullenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Ex Parte HornefCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  4. People v. DemesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. People v. PearsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  2. People v. ChaviraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  3. People v. ChrismanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. People v. SonleitnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  5. People v. HeidemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API