Legal Opinion

Dime Savings Bank v. Carlozzo

New York Supreme Court

Decided January 10, 1969PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtD. Ormonde Ritchie, J.

This is an application made on behalf of the plaintiff for an order amending the report of a Referee appointed to compute the amount of interest and principal due on a note secured by a mortgage on real property which is the subject matter of the foreclosure action.

The Referee computed interest on the unpaid balance due on the note at the rate of 6% per annum from November 1, 1967, the date of the default by the mortgagor, to September 11, 1968, the date of the report. It is the contention of the plaintiff that on and after July 1, 1968, interest should have been computed at the rate of 7%%…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. People Ex Rel. Emigrant Ind. Sav. Bank v. SextonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Ferris v. . HardNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Pryor v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  5. Syracuse Trust Co. v. First Trust & Deposit Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stull v. Joseph Feld, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  2. Rock Transport Properties Corp. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  3. Rachlin & Co. v. Tra-Mar, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
  4. Marine Midland Bank-Rochester v. VaethNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Gelco Builders v. Simpson Factors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API