Legal Opinion

Syracuse Trust Co. v. First Trust & Deposit Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The mortgage was due and payable as to its principal sum on August 1, 1929, and its payment could be enforced after that date without any declaration of default. If the conversation claimed to have resulted in an extension of time for payment of the principal sum due had brought about that result —■ and we hold that it did not — it was nudum pactum for the reason that it was not based on any consideration, for after August 1, 1929, the mortgage bore six per cent interest by statute. (Pryor v. City of Buffalo, 197 N. Y. 123; Olmstead v. Latimer, 158 id. 313; National Citizens’ Bank v. Toplitz,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pryor v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Rochester Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. StullAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dime Savings Bank v. CarlozzoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. First Trust & Deposit Co. v. W. W. Conde Hardware Co.New York Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Greenwich Savings Bank v. Cabin Holding Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API