Legal Opinion
Marine Midland Bank-Rochester v. Vaeth
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 4, 1976PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdward O. Provenzano, J.
Motions by the plaintiff (a domestic banking corporation) in both actions for summary judgment pursuant to CPLR 3212. The proofs submitted on the motions were sufficient to support the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
FINDINGS OF FACT (Action No. 1)
On November 29, 1973 defendant Vaeth executed and delivered to plaintiff a pledge security agreement and assigned to plaintiff 30,000 shares of Evans Products Company stock. The foregoing were given to secure the payment of any and all indebtedness, direct or indirect, then existing or subsequently incurred, owing to the plaintiff…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mallad Construction Corp. v. County Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1973
- Ehrlich v. American Moninger Greenhouse Manufacturing Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Norton v. Nat. Bank of Commerce of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1966
- O'Brien v. . YoungNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
- Leumi Financial Corp. v. RichterNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- First National Bank of Minneapolis v. Kehn Ranch, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. NatarelliNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- Bulk Oil (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Sun Oil Trading Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Washburn v. UNION NAT'L BANK & TR. CO.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Washburn v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.