Mitsugi Higashi v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Rosenstein, Judge:
The protest herein covers two entries of merchandise invoiced as “Herb Tea (Choju Cha)” and “En-Mei-Cha (Tea) ”, respectively, imported from Japan at Honolulu in 1967. The goods were classified under TSUS (Tariff Schedules of the United States) item 182.91 as “Edible preparations not specially provided for (including prepared meals individually packaged) : Other” and assessed with duty thereunder at 20 per centum ad valorem. Plaintiff, characterizing the merchandise as “herb tea”, claims that it is entitled to entry free of duty under TSUS item 160.50 as “Tea, crude or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- 200 Chests of TeaSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Lannom Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
- Warren Atlantic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Byrnes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Wing Coffee Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garza v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- West Coast Cycle Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- American Bristle & Hair Drawing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Marukai Hawaii, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971