Legal Opinion
Poe v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., Inc.
District Court, N.D. Georgia
Decided April 22, 1998No. 1:96-cv-00358PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
STORY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Gary Poe brought this diversity action for fraud, negligent misrepresentation and breach of contract. Plaintiff alleged Defendant sold him a used battery under the pretense that it was new. A status conference was held on April 3, 1998 at which time Plaintiff made an oral motion to reopen discovery for the purpose of deposing senior-level management of Sears. The Court concludes that additional discovery is not necessary. The record presently contains sufficient relevant evidence of Sears’ policies and procedures. Therefore,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Jurldine A. Donaldson v. Paul v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Robert & Company Associates v. Rhodes-Haverty PartnershipSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Henry Schein, Inc. v. StromboeTexas Supreme Court · 2002
- Schnall v. AT&T Wireless Services, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Schnall v. AT & T WIRELESS SERVICES, INC.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
- Wood v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 2010
- Werner Enterprises, Inc. v. Markel American InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.