Legal Opinion

United States v. Acklen

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided August 14, 1996No. 96-30019UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Acklen pleaded guilty to distribution of methamphetamine and conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine and was sentenced on the basis of d-methamphetamine. His motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was denied by the district court; and we vacated that judgment and remanded. 1 On remand, the district court again denied relief. We affirm.

Originally Acklen claimed trial counsel was ineffective for failure to contend at sentencing that the drug involved was 1-metham-phetamine and not d-methamphetamine. He made only conclusory allegations however. We remanded stating:

On remand, Acklen should tender some…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Wayne Boyd SeyfertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Jeffrey R. AcklenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  2. Reece v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. HallDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API