United States v. Acklen
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Acklen pleaded guilty to distribution of methamphetamine and conspiring to manufacture methamphetamine and was sentenced on the basis of d-methamphetamine. His motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was denied by the district court; and we vacated that judgment and remanded. 1 On remand, the district court again denied relief. We affirm.
Originally Acklen claimed trial counsel was ineffective for failure to contend at sentencing that the drug involved was 1-metham-phetamine and not d-methamphetamine. He made only conclusory allegations however. We remanded stating:
On remand, Acklen should tender some…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. Wayne Boyd SeyfertCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Jeffrey R. AcklenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Reece v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- United States v. HallDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1999