Legal Opinion

Buttner v. South Baltimore Steel Car & Foundry Co.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City (PheIps, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The plaintiff who is the appellant in this case was employed by the South Baltimore Steel Car and Foundry Company as assistant brakeman and to couple cars in its yard.

While in the performance of his duty he was injured, as he alleges, through the negligence of his employer, and he brought an action in the Superior Court of Baltimore City to recover damages as a compensation therefor.

At the close of the testimony of the plaintiff, he being the only witness produced to sustain the allegations of his narr. the learned Judge below, at the request of the defendant, withdrew the case from the jury.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wonder v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
  2. South Baltimore Car Works v. SchaeferCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902
  3. Hanrathy v. Northern Central Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1877

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bauman v. WoodfieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. McVey v. GerraldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  3. Casparis Stone Co. v. BoncoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1913
  4. Eyre-Shoemaker Construction Co. v. MacKinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
  5. Sav-A-Stop Services, Inc. v. LeonardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API