Legal Opinion

Clifford v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 25, 1986No. 85-1733Published

1Per curiam

The issue before this court is whether the PUCO failed to consider all of the factors outlined in Ohio Adm. Code 4901:1-7-04 before denying appellants’ petitions for EAS between Medina and Wadsworth. For the reasons set forth below, we hold that the order of the PUCO in the matter before us was made after a thorough and proper consideration of the law relative to this case and, therefore, should not be reversed.

At the outset, we note that a finding and order of the PUCO should not be disturbed unless it appears from the record to be manifestly against the weight of the evidence and so clearly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Cleveland v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. City of Kenton v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1965
  4. General Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API