Legal Opinion
KIVETT v. NEOLPHARMA, INC.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 27, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00664Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA DAVID KIVETT, Case No. 2:20-cv-00664-JDW Plaintiff v. NEOPHARMA, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM Cediprof Inc. and Lannett Company entered into two contracts. David Kivett worked for years on a commission basis soliciting Lannett’s business for Cediprof’s corporate affiliate Neolpharma Inc. Now he claims that Cediprof’s contract with Lannett triggered his commission. Cediprof and Neolpharma think otherwise because Mr. Kivett did not have a contract with Cediprof, and Neolpharma did not enter into a contract with…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Aetna Business Credit, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Williams v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.