Legal Opinion

Williams v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 12, 2000PublishedCited by 125 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 The representative parties in this class action suit assert that various automobile insurance carriers breached both a contractual duty and a duty of good faith and fair dealing by failing to tender promptly to their insureds alleged “undisputed amounts” in uninsured or underin-sured motorist benefits (UM/UIM benefits). The trial court granted the insurers’ preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer for the insureds’ failure to state cognizable causes of action under Pennsylvania law. We conclude that the insureds failed to establish that the insurers, prior to…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Terletsky v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Corestates Bank, N.A. v. CutilloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Fedas v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  5. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by125 opinions

  1. Condio v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Sullivan v. Chartwell Investment Partners, LPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  4. Brown v. Progressive InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. J.F. Walker Co. v. Excalibur Oil Group, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

120 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API