Merrimack College v. KPMG LLP
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtGants, C.J.
*434 **615 "The doctrine of in pari delicto bars a plaintiff who has participated in wrongdoing from recovering damages for loss resulting from the wrongdoing." Choquette v. Isacoff , 65 Mass. App. Ct. 1 , 3, 836 N.E.2d 329 (2005). The main issue presented in this civil case is whether, where the plaintiff is an organization acting through its agents, we should follow the traditional principles of agency law and impute the wrongdoing of those agents to the plaintiff organization when determining whether it should be barred from recovery under the in pari delicto doctrine. We hold that, for…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Smith v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Capital Gains Research Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- O'Melveny & Myers v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bateman Eichler, Hill Richards, Inc. v. BernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Halstrom v. DubeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- Chelsea Hous. Auth. v. McLaughlinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
- TOCCI BUILDING CORPORATION v. IRIV PARTNERS, LLC, & another (and a companion case ).Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2022
- Ebbe v. Concorde Inv. Servs., LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Moore v. Industrial Demolition LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.