Legal Opinion

In Re Dillard Department Stores, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 2006No. 04-1132PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Per curiam

In this original proceeding, relator Dillard Department Stores, Inc. seeks to compel arbitration of a retaliatory discharge claim filed by its former employee. The trial court denied Dillard’s motion to compel, and the court of appeals rejected Dillard’s petition for writ of mandamus. 153 S.W.3d 145. Because the trial court clearly abused its discretion in denying the motion to compel arbitration, we conditionally grant Dillard’s petition for writ of mandamus.

Delia Garcia worked as a sales associate at Dillard’s Sunland Park store in El Paso. In August 2000, Dillard adopted an arbitration…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. J.M. Davidson, Inc. v. WebsterTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. In Re Halliburton Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hathaway v. General Mills, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Tenet Healthcare Ltd. v. Cooper, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. In Re Merrill Lynch Trust Co. FSBTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Carey v. 24 Hour Fitness, USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  3. Morrison v. Amway Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  4. Haddock v. QuinnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2009
  5. D.R. Horton Inc. v. Brooks, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2006

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API