Legal Opinion

Gusich v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 14, 2001No. 1-01-0307PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Brien

Plaintiffs, James and Mary Gusich, appeal the order of the circuit court granting summary judgment for defendants, Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority and Windy City Maintenance, on plaintiffs’ negligence action. On appeal, plaintiffs argue that questions of material fact exist, precluding summary judgment. We reverse the order granting summary judgment for Windy City Maintenance and remand for further proceedings, and we affirm the order granting summary judgment for Metropolitan Pier & Exposition Authority.

On August 15, 1996, plaintiff James Gusich (plaintiff) was employed by Lewellen…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Henrich v. Libertyville High SchoolIllinois Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Ragan v. Columbia Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1998
  4. American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees, Council 31 v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Grove v. City of Park RidgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Valentino v. HilquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  2. International Memory Products of Illinois, Inc. v. Metropolitan Pier & Exposition AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. International Memory Products of Illinois, Inc. v. Metropolitan Pier and Exposition AuthorityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  4. Valentino v. HilquistAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API